mercoledì 8 giugno 2011

Las voces de 40 escritores abordan los trenes del Metro

DATE: 23/04/2011
AUTHOR: Y. Aguilar

A partir de hoy, las voces de reconocidos escritores, como Gabriel García Márquez, Mario Benedetti, Julio Cortázar, Jorge Luis Borges, Juan Gelman, Pablo Neruda, Carlos Fuentes, Tito Monterroso, Alí Chumacero, Octavio Paz, Juan Rulfo y José Emilio Pacheco, resonarán en las estaciones del Metro de la ciudad de México.

La iniciativa de cápsulas sonoras, titulado “El sonido de las palabras”, llevará hasta los usuarios del Metro la voz y la obra de 40 de los escritores más importantes en español, que serán transmitidas en diferentes horarios por el Sistema Audiometro, del 23 al 29 de abril, en el marco de Día Mundial del Libro y del Derecho de Autor, que organiza el Conaculta.

El objetivo de este programa es promover el hábito de la lectura entre los usuarios del Metro, a través de 60 cápsulas que tienen una duración de entre 30 y 80 segundos, realizadas con material de la Fonoteca Nacional. Asimismo, mañana, a través de Metromedia Audio del Sistema de Transporte Colectivo se transmitirán cápsulas del poema “La suave patria”, de Ramón López Velarde, para conmemorar 90 años de que ese texto fue publicado. (Yanet Aguilar)

sabato 21 maggio 2011

Viajando a todo tren

FROM: El País
DATE: 21/04/2011
AUTHOR: A. Elorza

¿Se ven igual los paisajes y las ciudades a bordo de un coche repleto de equipaje y con poco espacio para sus cinco ocupantes que en la suite de un tren de gran lujo que cuesta 7.500 euros? A ese precio, probablemente pocos tendrán la ocasión de conocer la diferencia, pero desde el próximo 14 de mayo existirá la posibilidad de conocer todo el norte de España, de San Sebastián a Santiago de Compostela, con la mirada de la alta sociedad.

Se trata del tren Transcantábrico Gran Lujo, que en un recorrido que dura ocho días y siete noches -saldrá cada sábado, hasta diciembre- mostrará a sus viajeros parte de Euskadi, Cantabria, Asturias y Galicia. Feve presentó ayer en Bilbao este tren convertido en un lujoso hotel.

Entrar en él se asemeja a hacerlo en un exclusivo club para ingleses adinerados de finales del siglo XIX, aquellos en que los sombreros de copa y los monóculos estaban a la orden del día. El olor a moqueta recién estrenada, la tapicería de los muebles, la madera bruñida, los veladores y la luz que atraviesa los cortinones permiten retroceder décadas, aunque los ordenadores, los móviles y otras tecnologías devuelven al visitante al presente.

Esta mezcla de sensaciones es el resultado de los 2,5 millones de euros que ha costado rehabilitar el tren, el segundo más lujoso del mundo, únicamente superado por el Blue Bird sudafricano. Nada que envidiar a los míticos Orient-Express o Transiberiano.

El ferrocarril puede trasladar a una treintena de pasajeros, que tendrán a cerca de 15 empleados a su disposición, entre camareros, operarios y un guía trilingüe. Hay limitaciones porque "las medidas son las que son", reconocía ayer José Antonio Rodríguez, director gerente de trenes turísticos de Feve, durante la presentación. Sin embargo, esas estrecheces no dejan de lado el lujo. Las suites se han ampliado y los cuartos de baño, habitualmente claustrofóbicos en cualquier tren, tienen espacio suficiente para acoger una sauna y una ducha con hidromasaje.

La directora de Turismo, Isabel Muela, respaldó esta iniciativa, ensalzando sus bondades para el sector turístico vasco: el tren servirá para "elevar el gasto medio" de los visitantes. Y es que el coste del billete para un viajero asciende a 7.500 euros, que se quedan en 3.750 si se comparte la suite, por lo que la capacidad adquisitiva de sus futuros usuarios es muy elevada. "El Gran Lujo trae clientes al País Vasco", añadió Rodríguez. A dicho precio hay que sumar comidas y cenas en las ciudades en las que para, no incluidas. Los viajeros pasarán dos días en Euskadi.

Las reservas, en su gran mayoría de turistas alemanes, norteamericanos, australianos y mexicanos, han cubierto ya las plazas para mayo y junio. Españoles, pocos. "Es lógico que los vascos utilicen su dinero para viajar a otros lugares", reconoció Rodríguez.

venerdì 20 maggio 2011

On Journey, Young Tunisians Need Only a Final Destination

DATE: 19/04/2011
AUTHOR: Steven Erlanger

VENTIMIGLIA, Italy — In the American Bar, across the square from the train station here, they have had enough. “The Tunisians are everywhere,” the waitress said. “It’s been like this for a month. They sleep in the station and on the streets, and we’ve lost a lot of customers.”

Mara Scasso, an emergency room nurse, said she had never seen so many police officers in this western edge of Italy, on the French border. “Helping the refugees is a moral duty,” she said. “But here we have one of the highest unemployment rates in Italy; it’s a dead zone. I don’t see how we can help them.”

Thirty yards away, about 70 young Tunisian men sat around the lip of a dry fountain in Piazza Battisti, drinking coffee, asking for money and giving interviews. Some of them have been sent between Italy and France several times, and the police and immigration officers carefully monitor the trains and stations on the Riviera tourist route between Nice, Menton and Ventimiglia, stopping every young man who looks Tunisian.These young men — there are no women — are a kind of Ping-Pong ball in a French-Italian political soap opera: economic migrants from a newly free but chaotic Tunisia who have dared the seas to find opportunity in a European Union that does not want them.

Italy has started issuing temporary six-month residence permits to Tunisians who arrived before April 5, saying that European Union rules under the Schengen treaty, which allows passport-free travel, would let them travel into France and elsewhere. The French are turning many of them back if they lack other documentation or sufficient money, or if they simply cannot satisfactorily explain, at least to officials, the nature and duration of their visit. As a French policeman in the Nice train station said of the permits, “The Italians have created a beautiful stupidity.”

But the Italians feel put upon, given their proximity to Tunisia and the arrival of some 25,700 Tunisian refugees this year, and they are worried about an even larger influx from Libya. They are asking for “European solidarity” from a European Union that has no uniform policy on economic migrants, refugees or even political asylum, and some Italian politicians have even threatened, idly, to quit the European Union if it does not help Italy with the influx. But the Italians are most angry with France, which is where most of the Tunisians say they want to go.

As Foreign Minister Franco Frattini told the daily La Repubblica: “The problem of immigration is becoming a bit like the nuclear issue. Everyone wants to say something about it, but no one wants it in their backyard.”

Mohamed Haddaji is a good example. In January, he paid about $2,100 to travel to Lampedusa, an Italian island near Tunisia, on a small boat. Single and 25, he worked in a Tunis bakery, but with the collapse of state authority he took his chance to go to France, where he has family, he said, to have a better life.

The Italian authorities are pleasant, he said; the French are not. “We sleep in the streets in France,” he said. He came with $1,400; he is decently dressed and has various phone cards in his wallet for Tunisia, Italy and France. Like his friend Jalel, 23, he says he wants to earn money and return to Tunisia.

But he has no papers, except for a card with his name and photograph from an Italian charity, and the French police told him to go back to Italy to get some. Even if he gets a six-month residency card and can show the French a valid train ticket from Italy, he may still get sent back, said Francis Lamy, the prefect of France’s Alpes-Maritimes department.

The French police have the right and duty, Mr. Lamy said in an interview in Nice, to ask a foreigner “to justify the reason for his visit and the duration, and to demonstrate the means to pay for this stay,” he said — usually $88 a day. “If the person acts suspicious or the answers are not satisfactory, the state can, under Schengen, send the person back, in this case to Italy, and Italy has an obligation to retake him.”

Mr. Lamy has told police officers under his command — as well as the 240 in three mobile units sent from Paris to help him deal with the Tunisians — “to follow the rules strictly.” Those rules, he said, along with a new French security law passed last month, allow officers within 12 miles of the border to stop people for identity and security checks if they are suspected of violating the law, crossing illegally or smuggling.

The police have arrested 100 human traffickers, Mr. Lamy said. In March alone, he said, French authorities arrested 2,800 foreigners, nearly all Tunisian, of whom 1,700 were expelled from France. Of those, 1,450 were returned to Italy, and some 250 were returned directly to Tunisia. There was not a single woman or application for political asylum, he said, insisting that each case is treated separately and with judicial oversight.

Just this week, said a worker for the state-financed legal aid group, Forum Réfugiés, Tunisians who first came to her for help a month ago had been told to return to Italy to get papers. When they re-enter France, even with the papers, they are sent back to Italy for not having enough money. “Normally to have an identity check, the police need suspicion of an infraction,” said the worker, Maud, who works in a state detention center in Nice and asked that her last name not be used. “Today there is racial profiling.”


There is significant political pressure on both sets of police from their governments, which loudly denounce illegal immigration and seem less than rigorous in applying European Union regulations that forbid racial profiling, though they deny it.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, unpopular in opinion polls, has taken a strong anti-immigrant stance, personified by his new interior minister, Claude Guéant, who says France also wants to cut legal immigration.

Italy’s coalition government gets support from the Northern League, which runs on an anti-immigration platform, while Mr. Sarkozy “has a similar problem” with the far-right National Front. “And in a moment when presidential elections are looming, he cannot afford to be seen as weak in immigration,” said Marta Dassu, director of Aspen Institute Italia, a research group.

A good example of the tensions and hyperbole over the issue erupted on Sunday, when the French prefect, Mr. Lamy, asked the state railway company to halt trains from Ventimiglia to France because of a planned demonstration supporting the Tunisians. He acted on his own, he said, because he had evidence from his Italian counterpart that the protesters, who had no permit to demonstrate and included a group of “possibly 50 violent activists,” presented “a serious risk to public order.”

Italy reacted angrily, sending its ambassador in Paris to protest what it said was a border closing in violation of European Union laws and principles. In the end, the disruption of train traffic lasted only several hours, and the European Union said France had acted correctly.

But the issue remains hot. Christian Estrosi, the deputy mayor of Nice and a legislator from Mr. Sarkozy’s party, said, “It is a little too easy for Italy to be generous with the territory of others.”

At the dry fountain in Ventimiglia, a young man named Ali was spinning tales about Tunisia, claiming to be the brother of the vegetable seller who immolated himself and set off the Tunisian revolution, and then asking for money. “The Europeans are racist,” he said angrily. “They don’t like the Arabs.”

giovedì 19 maggio 2011

Travelers using technology find that trains beat planes

DATE: 19/04/2011
AUTHOR: Josh Noel

A few weeks ago I wrote about choosing to travel by train instead of plane for various reasons, one of them being that I could spread out and work uninterrupted for several hours as the landscape rolled by.

Turns out I'm not alone.

A recently released study concludes that travelers most often use technology on high-speed trains. That's followed by "curbside" buses (express services), Amtrak (normal-speed trains), Greyhound and, in last place, airplanes.

Planes have several drawbacks, said Joseph Schwieterman, a transportation professor and director of DePaul University's Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, which conducted the study.

Among them are the hassle of getting through security, being required to power off at takeoff and landing, and lack of space.

"A lot of business travelers want business-class seats (on airplanes) not even for the luxury, but to get work done," Schwieterman said. "The coach cabin is seen as a wasteland for electronics."

During two years of gathering information, researchers never observed a flight with more than half of the cabin using electronics. On buses and trains, "it happens all the time," Schwieterman said.

The project began as a study of how people use private technology on curbside buses traveling between cities. It soon expanded to other modes of transport.

Students, Schwieterman and Lauren Fischer, the Chaddick Institute research director, walked the aisles on 235 trips across the U.S. and in Western Europe to observe the technology people used.

Results were broken into "visual" (such as laptop computers) and "non-visual" (such as mp3 players). Rail was by far most popular for visual technology — the kind business travelers use. Why? Visual technology usually requires a tray table, elbow room and a power supply.

"Rail is the only one that gives you all three," Schwieterman said.

Some of the findings in the study aren't so surprising, like the fact that use of portable electronic devices rose significantly in 2010 from 2009 and that travelers "are rapidly shifting toward more sophisticated devices."

What was surprising — but made sense — was how unattractive airplanes are for interacting with technology.

The results make the case for greater federal investment in high-speed rail, which has been a priority of the Obama administration.

mercoledì 18 maggio 2011

Railway relics unearthed at condo project tell history of city’s boom

DATE: 19/04/2011
AUTHOR: Richard Blackwell

Relics of Toronto’s 19th-century railway boom, when train links began to turn the city into an industrial powerhouse, have been unearthed near Fort York.

However, given that they are at the base of the new Library District condominium project, their fate has yet to be decided.

Brick and masonry foundation walls uncovered by archaeologists are the remains of a huge cruciform-shaped engine-house complex built by the Grand Trunk Railway in the 1850s. These buildings, near the shore of Lake Ontario, marked the starting point of the railway’s westbound ribbon of track.

The site, adjacent to the Bathurst Street bridge south of Front Street, is part of the Library District construction project by Context Development and the Toronto Community Housing Corp. The area the archeologists are scrutinizing is roughly where the library building would be in the development, which will also include a condominium tower, social housing and a park.

According to railway historian Derek Boles, Toronto was basically a warehousing centre until the mid-19th century. The railways turned it into a manufacturing hub and “having an appreciation for that background is really important for understanding Toronto’s history,” he said.

What will happen to the unearthed building remnants is unclear, given the construction plans, but Mr. Boles said they should be saved.

Preliminary archaeological work on the site about four years ago revealed evidence of ruins, and historic maps indicated the developers could expect to find some parts of the engine house structure. The dig was organized to determine what would need to be dealt with before construction began.

Susan Hughes, supervisor of archaeology at the City of Toronto, said she was told last Thursday that some intact portions of the engine house had been found, including 2.5-metre-high foundation walls consisting of 15 layers of stone, and some timbers that supported the floors.

Ms. Hughes said everyone involved in the site is committed to some kind of “interpretation and commemoration” of what has been found, but exactly how that will be done is not yet clear. It could mean reconstructing some of the walls in the adjacent park, or possibly even keeping the archaeological finds in place under a glass floor in the library. The final decision will likely be made after a consultant’s report is received, and after negotiations are conducted between the city, the province and the developers.

“This is an important part of … telling the story of the 19th-century evolution of those lands,” Ms. Hughes said. However, “it is hard to know at this point whether it can be incorporated [in the project] in a reasonable way,” she added.

Ron Williamson, whose firm, Archaeological Services Inc., is conducting the dig, said what has been uncovered so far appears to be the northeast corner of the building’s foundation. But “we’re very early here,” he said, and it will take several more days to figure out the size and overall significance of the find.

David O’Hara, administrator of the Fort York museum, said the engine house appears on old plans and charts from the 1850s, just off the southeast corner of the fort.

He said the site was earlier occupied by a blockhouse, built in the late 1790s, that was part of the Fort York complex. But any remnants of that building were likely destroyed when the railway property was developed decades later.

The Grand Trunk Railway built the large engine house, which included a turntable, smithy, pump house and temporary passenger terminal, as part of its efforts to compete in the market for travel to the Midwest United States. The Grand Trunk had a separate line that ran to Eastern Canada, Mr. Boles said, but its terminus was three kilometres further east near the Don Valley. For several months in the mid-1850s, until the two lines were linked by rail, connecting passengers had to take a horse-drawn omnibus between the terminals.

The Grand Trunk eventually became part of Canadian National Railway.

martedì 17 maggio 2011

Time could be up for Swiss Railways watches

DATE: 19/04/2011
AUTHOR: Tom Mulier

BASEL: Mondaine, the maker of Official Swiss Railways watches, may have to shut a two-year-old factory because its timepieces are not Swiss enough.

The future of the Sfr10 million ($10.6 million) plant in Solothurn and its 110 workers would be jeopardised should larger rivals such as Swatch Group succeed in calls for fewer non-Swiss components to be allowed in Swiss-made timepieces, a co-owner of Mondaine, Ronnie Bernheim, said. Mondaine, which has been making watches modelled on the nation's railway-station clocks for 25 years, uses imported dials and cases.

''This law would be cutting the industry into two,'' Mr Bernheim said in Basel. ''The volume business will be killed, except for the big companies. Our foreign competitors are laughing.''

Watches were Switzerland's fastest-growing export last year. The industry has rebuilt itself since teetering on the brink of collapse in the 1970s. To keep its lead as other manufacturers shift to countries such as China in search of cheaper labour, the industry is trying to erect higher barriers to entry, which would make Swiss watches a scarcer luxury.

Since 1971, watchmakers have been allowed to use non-Swiss components for less than 50 per cent of the value of the watch's movement, or motor. The Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, which includes Swatch Group and its competitor Cie Financiere Richemont, asked the government in 2007 to add higher requirements on the use of Swiss components in the value of the entire timepiece. The government proposed that for industrial products, 60 per cent should come from Switzerland. A final decision may be made next year, said Jean-Daniel Pasche, head of the federation.

Luxury watchmaking is one of the few manufacturing industries that has resisted a full shift of production to Asia. Still, the industry's growth has attracted non-Swiss companies. Tianjin Seagull Watch, a Chinese company, has begun producing complicated watch mechanisms such as tourbillons, which on a Swiss watch can command prices of $US50,000 ($47,400).

martedì 10 maggio 2011

Quel finestrino con vista Tremiti

DATE: 14/04/2011
AUTHOR: Vincenzo Foti

Alla scoperta del paesaggio italiano visto dalle ferrovie locali. Questa volta è di scena il Gargano, tra San Severo e Peschici

Il Gargano - Sperone d'Italia - è un promontorio montuoso che dalla provincia di Foggia si protende verso Est nel mare Adriatico. In questa zona dai terreni carsici, chiusa a occidente dal Tavoliere, il paesaggio pugliese è caratterizzato da grotte e da terrazzi calcarei, che si innalzano fino alla quota di 1.055 metri, corrispondente alla cima del monte Calvo. Qui la montagna forma profonde voragini e valloni dall'aspetto selvaggio, cui si contrappongono i declivi collinari che si adagiano verso il mare. Il profilo della costa si presenta quasi ovunque alto e roccioso; sul versante settentrionale si trovano invece due grandi laghi: il Varano e il Lèsina.

Per visitare lo Sperone d'Italia e approfondirne la conoscenza torna utile il treno delle Ferrovie del Gargano, che con il suo percorso dapprima pianeggiante quindi scosceso sfiora il verde dell'omonimo parco nazionale, passa attraverso tratti aridi e costeggiando parte dei i laghi raggiunge le candide spiagge tra Rodi Garganico e Peschici.

Conclusasi la Grande Guerra, si profilava per le popolazioni la necessità di collegarsi alla linea Fs della dorsale adriatica. Il 17 settembre 1925 venne così stipulata una concessione a favore del Sindacato per le Strade Ferrate Garganiche, che prevedeva la realizzazione di una ferrovia a scartamento ridotto (950 mm) e trazione a vapore da San Severo a San Menaio. In seguito, invece, si optò per lo scartamento tradizionale (1.435 mm) e per la trazione con locomotive elettrica a corrente continua (3 kV), che proprio in quegli anni venivano sperimentate per la prima volta in Italia sulla tratta Benevento-Foggia. Nel maggio del 1930 vennero installati i primi binari e l'anno successivo i pali dell'alimentazione. I lavori procedettero alacremente, tanto che la San Severo-Peschici fu inaugurata, con quasi un anno di anticipo, il 27 ottobre 1931 diventando la prima ferrovia secondaria italiana elettrificata.

Il tracciato delle Ferrovie del Gargano è assai vario ed è stato progettato secondo i criteri in uso per le ferrovie secondarie: curve strette, pendenze rilevanti, rotaie leggere. All'inizio, il parco mezzi era costituito da quattro locomotive elettriche a carrelli, sette carrozze con 56 posti a sedere, 22 carri merci e un carro soccorso. Questa dotazione fu poi completata da due automotrici elettriche. La rete si sviluppa su una lunghezza complessiva di circa 140 chilometri e comprende le linee San Severo-Rodi-Peschici (Calenelle), Foggia-Lucera e Foggia-Manfredonia. La San-Severo-Rodi-Peschici è a scartamento ordinario, a binario unico. Accanto alle Fg, Trenitalia effettua un servizio di treni locali sulle relazioni San Severo-Foggia e San Severo-Foggia-Bari.

Appena lasciata la piccola stazione di San Severo, il treno si immette in una pianura molto fertile per poi iniziare, poco dopo l'isolata stazione di San Marco in Lamis, una ripida salita verso il promontorio e giungere qualche chilometro più tardi alla fermata di Apricena Superiore. Qui le rampe diventano meno impegnative e il culmine della linea viene toccato in località Ingarano a 274 metri di altezza, in prossimità di un passaggio a livello. Da questo punto in avanti il percorso è tutto in discesa e la vista del mare, ancora in lontananza, lascia senza fiato.

All'orizzonte si possono scorgere le isole Tremiti e i laghi costieri di Lèsina e di Varano, separati dal mare solo da una sottile lingua di terra. Proseguendo il viaggio, vengono toccati vari centri abitati per giungere, dopo un'ultima ripida discesa, a Carpino. Il paesaggio, sin qui piuttosto arido, diviene ora verdeggiante, con ampie pinete che degradano verso la costa nei pressi di Rodi Garganico. Lasciata la località balneare di San Menaio, si attraversa una folta vegetazione e infine si sbuca a Peschici, dove si viene accolti da una dolce baia con il pittoresco, candido paese arroccato su un dirupo di rocce a picco sul mare.

Nella parte centro-orientale del Gargano si estende un'area di grande valore naturalistico, che prende il nome dall'antica tribù italica degli Umbri, stabilitisi in questa zona dopo lunghe peregrinazioni. La Foresta Umbra, tra le più antiche di tutta Europa, crea una chioma fitta e impenetrabile ai raggi solari che dà rifugio a specie floristiche e faunistiche molto rare. Dal 1995 i giganteschi fusti di alberi centenari (faggi e pini d'Aleppo) che dalle rive del mare ricoprono il territorio fin oltre i mille metri sono protetti dal Parco Nazionale del Gargano. Ma il Parco tutela anche la ricchissima flora erbacea, che può vantare ben 56 specie di orchidee spontanee. Dal punto di vista geologico questo altopiano calcareo offre una serie di piccoli rilievi di roccia ai quali si susseguono delle depressioni, ove si raccolgono le acque piovane. La spiegazione di tale varietà deriva dal fatto che in epoche passate questo territorio univa le coste italiane a quelle balcaniche. Il successivo isolamento del promontorio, chiuso dal mare Adriatico su tre lati e dal Tavoliere sul quarto, fece sì che la zona preservasse un patrimonio di biodiversità dal valore inestimabile.

Attualmente, sulle Ferrovie del Gargano sono in corso importanti opere di ammodernamento e potenziamento del servizio ferroviario, che riguardano una variante del percorso tra San Severo e Apricena, le cui opere sono state appaltate nell'anno 2005 e sono in corso d'esecuzione. La velocizzazione della tratta Cagnano-Rodi è stata completata, mentre dal 14 luglio 2009, sulla Foggia-Lucera, dopo un periodo di sospensione, è stato riattivato l'esercizio ferroviario a suo tempo soppresso dalle Fs. Il servizio sulla linea Foggia-Manfredonia viene effettuato con corse sostitutive di altrettanti treni non più effettuati da Trenitalia.

lunedì 9 maggio 2011

Kenya revives its colonial rail system to meet its modern needs

DATE: 13/04/2011
AUTHOR: Mike Pflanz

ON THE 06:40am TO NAIROBI – We pull slowly out of Athi River station, leaving behind the run-down railroad shed that is now home to the Jesus Victory Center and a tinshack kindergarten.

Ahead, an hour-long commute, through the Athi plains once swarming with wildlife, beneath final approach to the international airport, through the smoggy iron roof slums and the industrial area, and into the heart of Nairobi.

“Ah, we love this thing,” smiles Steve Nyahe, 40, a graphic designer, who like most aboard the train used to have to sit cramped in a 14-seat "matatu" minibus taxi to town, stalled in jams and pollution, for two hours or more.

“She keeps time, she takes me to work in less than one hour, she’s cut my travel costs by 50 percent. Who can complain?”

The 6:40 a.m. from Athi River, 17 stops into Nairobi, is one of a raft of new peak time services to and from the city, more than doubling the total from 8 to 18 since March 1.

Passenger numbers have jumped 45 percent since then, to 716,922 last month, according to the privatized firm now running Kenya’s railroads.

More than 2,300 of them use the Athi River service each day – the equivalent of more than 164 squeezed minibus taxis.

Onboard the 6:40 a.m., Patricia Wachira, a customer services executive for an agrochemicals company, sat reading her Bible, the early morning sun streaming through the windows.

“When I heard that they were bringing a train, I couldn’t believe it,” she says. “A neighbor told me it was true, when I first used this route, just a month ago, it was my first time to be on a train.

“It is so different from the matatu, it’s comfortable, there’s no hassle, no loud noise, no jams, no pollution. There was no way I could read my Bible on the matatu. I arrive at work fresh, and it’s quicker. I have an extra hour in my day.”

Beside her, Stella Vanessa, 21, and Tracy Nderitu, 22, colleagues at a real estate agency, shared a vanity mirror to apply their make up.

“It’s great, that’s all I need to say,” said Nderitu. “We needed this thing very much, it’s there in every other country, it was about time we had it here in Kenya. The only question is, why did they wait for so long?”

In fact, revolutionary as taking the train seems to these commuters, the rails they’re riding on are older even than the country of Kenya itself. They are the reason Nairobi exists.

Way back in the late 19th century, ox-drawn wagons were used to ferry raw materials from the interior for export via to ships waiting at Kenya’s coast.

Adventurous British businesses flourishing in neighboring Uganda successfully petitioned the parliament in London to build a rail line to speed up the 900-mile journey.

The equivalent of $394 million was allocated for the audacious project, which would include carving railroads up and down the sometimes 45° escarpments of the Rift Valley that slices through in Kenya’s center.

Work started in 1896, and almost instantly hit disaster. At least 30 indentured Indian and African laborers had lost their lives to the infamous "Man-Eaters of Tsavo," a pair of male lions which attacked work camps. Hundreds died as engineers struggled to bridge ravines and negotiate the sharp gradients. Malaria cut down hundreds more.

What started as an expression of Britain’s imperial might ended in near fiasco. Having failed even to reach the Ugandan border, construction stopped in western Kenya as costs spiraled past $729 million.

Winston Churchill, the British prime minister, later put a typically brave face on his description of the railroad construction as ‘one of the finest expositions [of] the British art of ‘muddling through’.”

Opposition politicians at the time vehemently disagreed, labeling the project the "Lunatic Line."

But what was left behind, at least, was a link between the Indian Ocean and Kenya’s interior. And, near the railroad’s midpoint, Nairobi.

Kenya’s capital exists only because engineers were forced to pause here, in an empty swampland named Nyrobe by Masai herdsmen, as they prepared their assault across the Rift Valley.

What started as a railhead, with workers camping under canvas, gave birth to today’s still-growing city of four million people. From the city, Kenya itself grew, a country with borders, a currency, an administration.

Also born at the same time was a new concept. That an elite – initially the whites, later Kenya’s own post-independence big men – was entitled to take from the powerless poor whatever was their whim.

To earn back some of their outlay, the British needed businesses here in their new colony, producing materials and goods to be carried down to the coast for export.

To do this, the government in London offered an acre of prime farmland, land used for millennia by Kenya’s indigenous people, for a penny. Soon hundreds, then thousands, of British settlers arrived.

“If you really think about it, this railway is the source of all our problems,” said Charles Owino, 51, reading his Daily Nation at Nairobi station.

“That land was the Africans’. They were forced out, they moved to into other tribes’ lands and took over. That is the root cause of all election violence we see today, the fight over land. Even look where the clashes happen, they are in towns all along the railway line.”

Back on the 6:40 a.m. from Athi River, we’re starting to see evidence of the fallout from that entrenched, institutionalized, body politic of corruption.

We’re passing through the slums that ring the city center. Tin shacks crowd muddy lanes. Smoke from charcoal cooking fires hazes the morning air. Ungainly marabou storks circle above chaotic dumpsites.

Millions today live here in these unplanned settlements, ignored by successive governments more concerned with lining their pockets than socially serving the worst-off in this stratified society.

The fate of the railroads, once Kenya’s largest employer, once running scores of trains along 1,726 miles of track, mirrors the country’s near-collapse under the rule of Daniel Arap Moi, the former president.

Today, fewer than 600 miles are operational, and decades of poor maintenance mean that maximum speeds are down to around 30 m.p.h. Derailments, sometimes fatal, are common. Some 90 percent of Kenya’s freight, which should be the backbone of any rail system, is moved by road.

“You know the problem here was management,” said one senior official with 20 years experience at Kenya Railways. “Of course if you are asked to steal money for somebody, you also steal some for yourself. This went all throughout the company. It has brought us to where we are today.”

Where we are today is what keeps Fred Owino, Daniel Ongombe and Daniel Kamau busy.

Between them, the trio in charge of the locomotive workshop at Nairobi Train Station have 47 years of experience maintaining the giant General Electric 12-cylinder train engines, bolted together in the early 1970s in Erie, Pennsylvania.

When Daily Dispatches visited, Engine No. 9312 had just spent the night pulling a dozen carriages up from the coast. Within an hour, it was due out again, to the far side of Kenya at Malaba on the border with Uganda.

Kamau, working swiftly, greased the cylinder head. Ongombe, up in the cab, was checking engine pressure, his eyes scanning the spider’s web of wires regulating the engine’s scarce electronics.

“I can say that the best part of the job is finding a locomotive with very complicated problems, and fixing it ahead of time,” says Owino, the shift foreman.

His 17-year-old son, raised around the railways, is studying hard to follow his father’s footsteps into this workshop. “That will make me very, very proud,” he beams. His smile then slips a little. “I can only hope that there is more advancement and he gets to work on a modern railways system. It’s coming, I’m sure.”

It’s Brown M. Ondego’s job to make that happen. He is executive chairman of Rift Valley Railways (RVR), the private firm which won the concession to upgrade the Kenyan and Ugandan rail network. He took over from the first management team, who struggled to bring any improvements.

“It was collapsing, it had literally failed,” said Ondego, of his predecessors’ approach.

“The management was not up to speed, and they failed to bring in capital to invest, and it means it was, and still is, a fairly dilapidated network.”

Freight is his key focus, but an easy PR win for RVR was the commuter services. “We were not contractually obliged to take that up, but we did it basically because of the demand from the public,” says Ondego. “I think with that and other moves on our part, you’re starting to see a tremendous improvement.”

As the 6:40 a.m. pulled in to Nairobi Station’s Platform 2 a little over an hour after leaving Athi River, the swirl of commuters decanting out and filing towards the station exit would suggest Ondego and his team are doing something right.

Sharp-suited businesswomen, kids in school uniforms, young guys in low-slung jeans on smartphones and men in jackets and ties all swarmed off the train, leaving it empty save for the cleaners with their brushes and buckets.

Alongside RVR’s promises of more commuter routes, more stations, refurbished engines and carriages, the government has drawn up plans for a light-rail system from Nairobi’s suburbs to and around its center.

Easing access into this massively congested city, clearing some of its traffic bottlenecks, bringing goods here cheaper, all will springboard Nairobi’s growth.

But glance back the other way, into the rail sidings, where long convoys of container cars stand idly, slowly rusting in the sun. Listen as the clang of hammer against iron drifts in from the workshop in the distance, where Fred Owino and his gang work on.

Easy fixes like the commuter lines are all very well and very welcomed. But Kenya’s railways have a long climb ahead of them to reach the long-promised glorious new era.

martedì 19 aprile 2011

Tutte le strade riportano a Mosca

FROM: Il Post
DATE: 08/04/2011
AUTHOR: Paolo Pantaleo

C’è un progetto di una grande arteria ferroviaria per collegare direttamente Tallin a Berlino, passando per i paesi baltici e la Polonia. Si chiama Rail Baltica, e dovrebbe spostare su ferrovia buona parte del trasporto merci fra il nord Europa e l’Europa centrale attualmente su strada. Se ne parla già dal 2004 e l’Unione Europea lo ha messo fra le sue priorità nella politica dei trasporti. In questi giorni il commissario UE ai trasporti Siim Kallas – infastidito dallo scarso interesse che sente per il progetto europeo – ha avvertito i paesi baltici che la Rail Baltica, senza una chiara volontà politica dei governi estone, lituano e lettone, rischia di saltare, e con esso i finanziamenti per oltre 12 miliardi di euro che l’Unione Europea è disposta a offrire. Ci sono alcuni aspetti difficili da risolvere, come la trasformazione dei binari a scartamento “russo” dei paesi baltici in binari a scartamento ridotto europeo, ma alla Rail Baltica è interessata anche la Finlandia, attraverso un collegamento navale con Tallin che renderebbe Helsinki a portata di treno da Berlino.

In questi ultimi anni di crisi economica sono proprio i paesi baltici ad aver perso interesse nel progetto, anche perché le sirene di Mosca hanno ricominciato a suonare irresistibili, almeno sul piano economico, in particolare su quello degli scambi commerciali. Solo sul tema dell’indipendenza energetica i paesi baltici, che attualmente dipendono quasi totalmente dal gas di Gazprom, tentano politiche di sganciamento, pur con diversa intensità. In un momento in cui di nucleare nessuno vuole più parlare, la Lituania ad esempio spinge forte sul suo progetto di centrale nucleare di Visaginas, sempre più debolmente sostenuta da Estonia e Lettonia, a cui la Russia risponde con i progetti di centrali nucleari di Kaliningrad e Astravets, quest’ultimo insieme alla Bielorussia.

Nei trasporti e negli scambi commerciali le relazioni russo-baltiche continuano a essere molto forti. Il tiepido interessamento per la Rail Baltica coincide infatti con il forte rilancio della Lettonia del progetto per i treni ad alta velocità fra Riga e Mosca, affiancato da un altro progetto per un’autostrada a quattro corsie che collegherebbe la capitale lettone a quella russa. Ne hanno parlato in questi giorni i due ministri dei trasporti, il russo Levitin e il lettone Augulis. In particolare all’interno della coalizione di governo lettone è il sindaco di Ventspils, Aivars Lembergs, uno degli ultimi e più potenti oligarchi del paese, che spinge verso il rafforzamento delle vie di comunicazione con Mosca, per fare di Ventspils, importante porto nel baltico occidentale, la porta privilegiata per gli scambi commerciali fra l’Europa del nord e centrale e la Russia.

I nodi politici che rendono problematici i rapporti fra i paesi baltici e la Russia sono ancora tanti (le minoranze russofone, la storia, un’innata diffidenza fra le due comunità) ma il potere del rublo, in tempi di crisi economica, continua ad avere un certo peso. Nel 2010 gli scambi fra Russia e Lettonia sono aumentati del 42 per cento, oltre 6 miliardi di dollari.

lunedì 18 aprile 2011

Sam, il manager ha sei anni

DATE: 05/04/2011
AUTHOR: n/a

Una grande passione per i treni e il desiderio di trasformare questo interesse in carriera già a sei anni. E' accaduto a Sam Pointon, un bambino inglese che a soli 6 anni, nel 2009, si era candidato per un posto da direttore del museo dei treni di York ricevendo un incarico da dirigente speciale. Il piccolo era venuto al corrente dell'imminente pensionamento del precedente direttore del National Railway Museum, Andrew Scott, e aveva inviato una tenera lettera di candidatura scritta a mano per rimpiazzarlo. La lettera deve aver commosso lo staff del museo che ha deciso di nominare il ragazzo "direttore del divertimento", una carica speciale creata solo per lui. Nella lettera Sam spiega: "Ho solo sei anni ma credo di poter fare questo lavoro". A distanza di diue anni il piccolo Sam è ancora in carica e, proprio in questi giorni, è stato richiamato dal museo per ispezionare i treni in vista delle feste pasquali.

domenica 17 aprile 2011

Viaggio sul treno dei disperati "Andiamo a Parigi, ce la faremo"

DATE: 04/04/2011
AUTHOR: Lello Parise

ORIA - Il treno dei desideri ha la sigla "Le" e un numero: 562059. Arriva alla stazione ferroviaria di Oria alle 16,54, puntualissimo. "È questo?" domanda Youssef. "Sì, questo è quello per Taranto. Andiamo?". Nello scalcagnato scalo di questa città del Brindisino lontana appena tre chilometri dalla tendopoli di Manduria, che da oggi ospiterà più di tremila migranti sbarcati da Lampedusa, ci sono otto ragazzi come Youssef. Hanno tra i 20 e i 27 anni, giubbotti, jeans, scarpe Adidas, niente bagagli, due dicono di chiamarsi Ahmed e altri due Kaled, ci sono anche Komi, Niza, Komel. E poi c'è Youssef, che di anni ne ha 24 e che diventa il portavoce del gruppo. Parlano tutti in francese, non conoscono l'italiano. Aspettano il treno sotto un cartello dell'Ue con la scritta: "L'Europa investe nel tuo futuro". Sembra un presagio.

"Abbiamo dormito per quattro giorni nel centro di accoglienza. Poi l'altra sera, abbiamo deciso di andare via. No, non abbiamo avuto problemi ad uscire dal campo. Ci siamo incamminati verso Oria e abbiamo raggiunto la stazione. Abbiamo dormito per strada. Sì, lo so, potevamo aspettare ancora e prendere il treno per Roma. Ma non possiamo rischiare di essere beccati, parte troppo tardi". Alle 21,49.

Il sole è alto, lungo il viale alberato che porta alla stazione spunta il muso di un'automobile della polizia, ma gli agenti non scendono per vedere chi c'è e chi non c'è sul binario 1, fanno un mezzo giro della piazza e vanno via. Youssef e gli altri fuggiaschi, tirano un respiro di sollievo. "Non si sono accorti di noi". Tre o quattro italiani che aspettano lo stesso treno, fanno finta di niente. Ed eccolo il convoglio "Le 562059". "Finalmente". Gli otto si sparpagliano in tutte le carrozze. Youssef insieme con Komel si accomodano all'interno di uno degli ultimi scompartimenti. "In questa maniera, cerchiamo di non essere notati". Sono per metà spaventati e per metà sorridenti. "Il viaggio non sarà breve". Pagano il biglietto. "Sì, abbiamo del denaro. Ma non ti diremo quanto abbiamo in tasca". Non ci si può fidare del primo venuto. "Komi, per esempio, sette anni fa ha vissuto in Francia. Quando Sarkozy è arrivato al potere ha cacciato dal Paese lui e tutti quelli come lui, clandestini. Vogliamo andare a Parigi, nessuno escluso. Io, proprio a Parigi, ho tre fratelli che lavorano. Che cosa farò? Il cameriere, il meccanico, qualsiasi cosa". Komel interrompe Youssef: "Il lavoro in Europa, è tutto. Io, un po' di tempo fa, sono partito per la Turchia, ma sono ritornato indietro. Dopo tre mesi, avevo guadagnato solo 300 dollari. Ma in Tunisia, io sono di Djerba, è peggio: 3 euro al giorno, non di più. Bisognava scappare, a qualsiasi costo".

Mezz'ora dopo le cinque del pomeriggio, il treno si ferma a Taranto. "Tutto bene, fino ad ora". Prossima tappa, Roma. Signori, si parte. "No, non so quando riusciremo ad arrivare a Ventimiglia. Se tutto andrà bene, da lì potremo proseguire per Nizza. Alla fine, Parigi". Il sorriso di Youssef, mentre dal finestrino scorrono i muretti a secco della campagna pugliese, all'improvviso si trasforma in una smorfia: "Mi dispiace che non sia qui con noi pure Walid, ha 28 anni, è più grande di me, ma siamo amici per la pelle. Ci siamo salutati al campo. Lui è rimasto perché ha bisogno di un permesso di soggiorno: vuole raggiungere la moglie in Germania, ma soprattutto vuole riabbracciare sua figlia, che ha otto mesi". Gli occhi di Youssef dipingono uno sguardo orgoglioso: "Dalla Francia vorrei rientrare in Tunisia con la mia carta. Sì, insomma, il documento che mi consentirà di non nascondermi come un topo. Voglio farla vedere a mia madre e a mio padre, per dimostrare che ce l'ho fatta. Ma è vero che a Ventimiglia non sarà facile passare la frontiera? I gendarmi non sono buoni. Però niente e nessuno potrà fermarci. Vedrai, ci riusciremo". Un treno dopo l'altro, col cuore in gola.

lunedì 28 marzo 2011

Il Regno che non aveva bisogno di ferrovie fu il primo a costruirle

DATE: 21/03/2011
AUTHOR: Davide Cristaldi

Anni di revisionismo incontrollato in cui non ci si è mai fermati a consolidare quanto si era scoperto, unito all'immancabile binomio Borbone=arretratezza, danno il pretesto a giornalisti (napoletani) come Angelo Lomonaco del Corriere del Mezzogiorno, di scrivere articoli del tipo "Borbone, il regno delle ferrovie? Falso mito, lo dimostrano i dati Svimez".

Prima di proseguire oltre è necessario fare una doverosa premessa: a che servono le ferrovie e qual'era il loro scopo nel'800?
La rete ferroviaria nacque per mettere in comunicazione città e villaggi dell'entroterra in un epoca in cui l'unico mezzo veloce per il trasporto di cose e persone era ancora la nave, ed il mare la strada più rapida. Ecco perchè le città più grandi e più sviluppate, da sempre sorgono in riva al mare.

Negli Stati Uniti è leggendaria la ferrovia che, collegando il selvaggio West con la East Coast, consentì un collegamento molto più veloce tra l'Atlantico ed il Pacifico, rispetto alle tradizionali carovane o alla circumnavigazione del continente americano.
E che dire della famosa Transiberiana, sulla quale il regime zarista puntò per collegare S.Pietroburgo con le coste del pacifico passando per lo sterminato territorio siberiano, che altrimenti era raggiungibile solo con lunghi e faticosi viaggi a cavallo o avventurosi viaggi di mare.

Anche in Italia lo sviluppo ferroviario ottocentesco ebbe il suo maggiore successo soprattutto nelle regioni continentali della penisola, in particolar modo in Pianura Padana, dove la capitale del Piemonte, Milano e tutte le più importanti città del Lombardo-Veneto, non avendo sbocchi sul mare, trovarono nella rotaia il modo per aumentare la capacità e la velocità del trasporto delle merci e delle persone.

La ferrovia non ebbe la stessa fortuna nelle parte peninsulare d'Italia, ovvero il Regno delle Due Sicilie, bagnato da migliaia di km di coste.
La vocazione marittima di quello stato infatti determinò lo sviluppo di una delle principali potenze navali del Mediterraneo, cosa che il Piemonte o il Lombardo Veneto con il porto di Venezia, Trieste e Genova non riuscirono mai ad ottenere.

Il merito del Regno delle Due Sicilie non sta tanto nell'aver costruito la prima ferrovia in Italia (e terza in Europa), il più grande stabilimento ferroviario d'Italia (Pietrarsa) e di aver venduto più di una locomotiva al Piemonte; quanto nell'aver fatto tutto ciò in uno stato che aveva puntato tutto sul mare.
Un paragone che possiamo fare oggi, ma a parti inverse: al Sud compriamo bottiglie di salsa Mutti e Star prodotte nelle fabbriche del Nord Italia, nessuno però dice che le coltivazioni di pomodoro in Padania sono pressochè inesistenti, perchè quello che conta è il successo industriale.

Anche Ferdinando II aveva capito che le ferrovie erano un buon mezzo per collegare le città interne del Regno e poi una linea che avesse collegato il tirreno con l'adriatico, avrebbe evitato ai viaggiatori la circumnavigazione dello stivale.
Ma ahimè, i fatti del 1860 impedirono questa grande impresa.
Le tratte ferroviare borboniche che furono messe in esercizio e quelle già progettate non prevedevano in nessun caso la concorrenza (peraltro inutile) al trasporto navale, esse infatti coprivano solo tragitti interni, lontano dalla costa.

Borbone, il regno delle ferrovie? Falso mito, lo dimostrano i dati Svimez

DATE: 21/03/2011
AUTHOR: Angelo Lomonaco

Solo dopo l’Unità d'Italia la rete si sviluppò. Anche al Sud Ferdinando II inaugurò la prima tratta ma poi si fermò

NAPOLI - I lavori per realizzare la strada ferrata che avrebbe collegato Napoli con Nocera, con una diramazione per Castellammare, cominciarono l’ 8 agosto 1838. Dopo tredici mesi il primo tratto a un solo binario giungeva al Granatello di Portici. I vagoni furono costruiti nello stabilimento di San Giovanni a Teduccio, le locomotive acquistate dalla società inglese Longridge Starbuck e Co. di Newcastle. In seguito anche le locomotive furono costruite a Pietrarsa ed esportate pure in altri Stati italiani. Il Piemonte, per esempio, nel 1847 acquistò sette locomotive napoletane. Il primo tratto della Ferrovia fu inaugurato il 3 ottobre 1839 con grande solennità. Re Ferdinando II a mezzogiorno diede il segnale di partenza personalmente con un discorso: «Questo cammino ferrato— disse — gioverà senza dubbio al commercio e considerando come tale nuova strada debba riuscire di utilità al mio popolo, assai più godo nel mio pensiero che, terminati i lavori fino a Nocera e Castellammare, io possa vederli tosto proseguiti per Avellino fino al lido del Mare Adriatico».

Partì quel giorno, tra l’entusiasmo e l’orgoglio di tutti, il primo convoglio ferroviario italiano. Nel 1840 la via ferrata arrivò a Torre del Greco, nel 1842 a Castellammare. I lavori furono continuati per portare la Ferrovia fino a Nocera e terminarono nel 1844. Un secondo tronco ferroviario, finanziato direttamente dallo Stato, raggiunse Caserta nel 1843 e Capua nel 1844. Nel 1853 fu concessa in appalto la costruzione della Nola-Sarno-San Severino, che avrebbe dovuto proseguire per Avellino. Il programma prevedeva poi che la linea Napoli Capua fosse prolungata a Cassino e allacciarsi con la ferrovia dello Stato Pontificio. La Napoli-Avellino doveva proseguire da un lato per Bari-Brindisi-Lecce, da un altro per la Basilicata e Taranto. Furono programmate anche le linee per Reggio e la tratta da Pescara al Tronto. In Sicilia erano previste le linee Palermo Catania-Messina, e Palermo-Girgenti-Terranova. È per questo che la ferrovia è uno dei principali motivi di vanto dei sostenitori dell’idea di un Sud avanzato, penalizzato piuttosto che aiutato dall’Unità d’Italia. Ma è stato veramente così? I dati dimostrano, al contrario, che questo è solo un luogo comune. I progetti dei Borbone erano di tutto rispetto, ma non trovarono corrispondenza nei fatti. Secondo i dati contenuti nel ponderoso studio della Svimez intitolato «Un secolo di statistiche italiane. Nord e Sud 1861-1961» , edito mezzo secolo fa del quale è in via di pubblicazione l’edizione aggiornata «150 anni di statistiche italiane: Nord e Sud» , nel 1861 nel Mezzogiorno l’estensione della linea ferrata era di 184 chilometri, concentrati in Campania. Nel Centro, però, i chilometri erano 535 e nel Nord 1.801, dieci volte in più. Che fine avevano fatto i progetti così enfaticamente presentati da re più di vent’anni prima e supportati anche dalla produzione? Nel regno di Ferdinando II, dopo la repressione del ’49, vi fu una riduzione drastica della costruzione di nuove strade ferrate, la cui realizzazione si infrangeva contro l’acuto scetticismo del re, che giudicò i collegamenti ferroviari strumento di propagazione delle idee rivoluzionarie e, quindi, elemento di rischio per la stabilità politica dello stato, dolorosamente ristabilita nel 1849, come spiegò Raffaele de Cesare, storico pugliese e giornalista del Corriere della Sera, in «La fine di un regno» , pubblicato in tre volumi nel 1909 e poi in ristampa anastatica qualche anno fa.
Mentre le locomotive meridionali frenavano, nel resto d’Italia il treno avanzava rapidamente. Meno di un anno dopo la Napoli-Portici, il 18 agosto 1840, furono inaugurati i 13 chilometri della Milano-Monza, che aprivano la Imperial Regia Privilegiata Strada di Ferro. Seguirono molte tratte in tutte le regioni del Nord e anche del Centro. Di fatto, quindi, dopo lo slancio iniziale, Ferdinando II fu di freno allo sviluppo e ritardò di un decennio lo sviluppo della rete delle Due Sicilie. E alla sua morte, nel 1859, subito ripartirono i progetti di ampliamento delle ferrovie. Un nuovo stop ci fu nel 1860, in seguito alla perdita dell’indipendenza e l’annullamento di tutte le convenzioni da parte del Dittatore Garibaldi. Poco dopo, tuttavia, i lavori furono in gran parte ripresi e portati a termine. Emblematico il caso della galleria dell’Orco, inaugurata il 31 maggio del 1858, il primo tunnel ferroviario del Regno delle Due Sicilie e forse del mondo, che però andò in esercizio solo dopo la caduta dei Borbone, il 17 febbraio 1861, per collegare la linea ferroviaria Capua Cancello-Sarno a Mercato San Severino, sulla vie delle Puglie. E inequivocabile il dato del 1886, riportato dalla Svimez. In 25 anni i chilometri di strada ferrata si erano moltiplicati passando da 1.801 del 1861 a 5.904 nel Nord, da 535 a 2.176 nel Centro, nelle Isole erano stati costruiti 1.324 chilometri di linea, 893 dei quali in Sicilia, e nel Mezzogiorno continentale i 184 chilometri erano diventati 2.698. Dei quali 734 in Campania, 767 in Puglia e i rimanenti ripartiti in tutte le altre regioni.

venerdì 25 marzo 2011

A working life: The railway controller

DATE: 19/03/2011
AUTHOR: Leo Benedictus

It is possible, I suppose, to have thoroughness trained into you, but Deborah Hawken strikes me as a person who was born with hers. "Obviously this is a quiet area, so you will have to switch your mobile phone to silent," she explains, as we swish upstairs into First Great Western's Swindon control centre. "And there's no fire alarm expected today," she adds, "so if it does go off, it might be a fire. In which case, the exits are here and here." I nod, and make the necessary mental preparations.

Hawken begins the tour. Pointing, around an archipelago of tidy desks, she shows me the maintenance controller who talks to drivers on the phone to solve technical problems; there's the service controller, who investigates the cause of delays; there's the crew delivery managers; there's the high-speed desk; there's the people who arrange road replacement services; there's the customer information team, which posts all the service information online and on the station display boards.

The office is staffed constantly, in shifts, so none of the computers are personalised with clutter. The mood is relaxed and cheerful.

As a senior controller, the post she has held for almost a year, Hawken is supposed to supervise everything around us. If you ever find yourself on a delayed First Great Western train – which could happen anywhere from London to Penzance to Hereford to Brighton – then it is to this building, and to Hawken's desk, that you should direct your prayers and imprecations. I suggest this is a terrifying responsibility. "Yeah," Hawken laughs, sounding not in the least terrified at all.

Yet the spread of problems that she could face each day would frighten many people off. "We'll deal with anything," she explains, "from safety-related things, to when a train breaks down, to when you've got major signalling faults, to simple things like when someone's left a wallet on a train. It's all sorts. Some days it will run reasonably smoothly, other days it's just one thing after another and you're really up against it."

All seems calm this morning, however. Nearby, some of Hawken's colleagues are making wry suggestions about how to fix a hole in the platform at Dorking. Besides this, everything appears to be running well. To keep this peace, Hawken relies on her phone and computer. Across several screens at her desk she can watch the progress of all the trains along their routes and keep an eye on the condition of the signals. The picture resembles a fearsomely detailed circuit diagram, studded with components. Each train has an identifying number – 1A16 and 1B94 are two that catch my eye – with different colours to indicate their progress. A few are red or yellow, but most are green. Which means on time, I presume? "Yes," Hawken says. "Yellow is getting later and the red is late." The final word is aspirated rather shamefully.

In this industry, however, lateness is inevitable. When Hawken began working on the railways, aged 20, as a welcome host at Newton Abbot station, she found delays as frustrating as any passenger. Later, as she gained more responsibility, becoming station manager for four years, she still sometimes could not understand why the controllers seemed almost determined to inconvenience her customers.

When she became a controller herself however, in 2001, she started to see how bewilderingly complex the picture really was – to anyone who could see all of it.

Delays can come from many sources, for one thing. There are the breakdowns and the "wrong kind of snow" and the other things that people grumble over, but there are also lightning strikes, suicides, sheep on the line, floods and – frequently these days – cable thefts to worry about. People steal the signal wires for the copper, Hawken explains. Or, often, they mistakenly steal fibre optic ones. A recent theft in south Wales affected, to the best of her recollection, about 30,000 people. "You need a big sign that says, 'This is NOT copper'," she smiles.

And once a delay has been caused, the ramifications can be complex, creating dilemmas that you would need a moral philosopher to solve. For instance, when Hawken was a station manager she often asked control for permission to hold a mainline train on the platform so passengers from a delayed branch-line train could still connect to it. As often as not she would be refused, and struggled to understand why. Now she realises this had probably been a sensible decision.

First, there is the obvious point that the mainline train, and those behind it, may also have passengers who will miss their connection if they are delayed. And this is far from the end of the matter. "By holding a train, you could cause all sorts of problems," Hawken explains. "Some services don't have very long at their destinations before they go back out again. You've also got train crew due to have a break, before not necessarily working back on the same service."

And if you end up with crew in the wrong place, the problems amplify. For instance, each driver can only "sign" certain routes, meaning that these are the only stretches of track they are experienced enough to drive trains on. So if the necessary drivers are not where they are needed, you cannot always guarantee that a colleague will be able to take their place. In short, sometimes the convenience of a small group of passengers must be sacrificed so that a larger group can arrive on time. "I don't think it's a decision that anyone takes lightly," Hawken says, "but we do need to look at the problems that [it] could cause."

Now aged 34, Hawken still takes the train to work and back, so she understands how what she does affects people. "I do hear passengers having a bit of a grumble," she admits. "Yes, I can understand why they get upset when they're delayed, but I don't ever take it personally because I know – myself and all my colleagues – we do work as hard as we can to provide a good service. But sometimes it's difficult, and of course the travelling public aren't ever going to realise that … I think you've just got to accept it really, otherwise you really would be a in a bad mood a lot of the time."

Ironically, even though Hawken and her colleagues do everything they can to reduce delays, she admits it is the days when things go wrong that she enjoys most. These are the days, after all, when she is needed most – and when the greatest challenges come up. "I just love the fact that I never know what I'm going to be dealing with next," she says. "That's what I enjoy about the job … It's when you've got a really difficult problem and you manage to get around it. Whether it's myself or one of my colleagues saying, 'Have you thought of this?'. Then we try it and it works."

Even so, challenges like these cannot be relied upon to form an orderly queue. "You can't plan for one incident to happen after you've dealt with the previous one," Hawken says. "So you can be sitting there, and you can be told that you've lost all the signalling at Didcot, and then you'll be told that you've got a train failure at Reading. Then you'll be told that a train has struck a load of sheep down on the Barnstaple line and it can't move. They'll all come within a few minutes of each other."

At such times, the control floor becomes unrecognisable from the peaceful place it is today. "It gets very noisy because everyone's on the phones," she says. "You get a few people coming in to try and help, or to try and find out exactly what's going on. So the control floor tends to be busier. It's about trying to prioritise what you deal with, who you speak to first, and try to drown out the noise so you can concentrate on what you're doing."

And what is that like? "I quite enjoy the adrenaline rush," she admits. "And when I look back I get satisfaction out of thinking that I got all those passengers on the move. We sorted that out. It went as well as it could do."

One thing that no one on the railways takes pleasure from, however, are the regular incidents of suicide that blight the track. "Only last week, I had a driver phone up to report he'd just struck someone," Hawken says, retreating momentarily from her usual cheery tone.

"It's difficult, because I've never experienced it myself, but you realise it must be an absolutely horrendous thing. This bloke had just come across someone who was lying on the track with his head on the rail." She pauses sadly for a moment.

At other times, meanwhile, the problems she faces can be positively entertaining. "A passenger on one of our trains phoned up to report some 'animal cruelty' involving a man and a goat in a field," she says, pronouncing the words in such a way as to leave me in no doubt about exactly what the man was doing. "And there have been a few times," she adds, her colleague chuckling along this time, "when we've had reports of men touching themselves on trains. It's not that unusual." I see, I say, and nod. What's the procedure there? Hawken's response is raucous laughter.

Curriculum vitae

Pay £43,000 a year, including overtime.

Hours Eight hours a day, in a rotating shift pattern.

Work-life balance "It's a little bit difficult, but it's workable. I think it works as well as it ever will. I'm not going to say I find it easy, but I find my job rewarding so it is worthwhile. Doing shifts helps, because it means I'll be with my son in the morning or the afternoon."

Best thing "The variety, and being with so many excellent people."

Worst thing "You can't actually see the effects of what you do on the ground. You're just seeing it on the map. It might be nice to be more connected to the problems we solve."

Overtime
Last night Deborah ate 'spaghetti bolognese when I was here. Will that do?' Deborah always hears '"What's that?" Because my job title doesn't actually indicate what we are or what we do. I find it difficult explaining to people who don't work on the railway what I actually do.' Deborah enjoys reading chick-lit 'I have to say, I'm a bit sad, but the Shopaholic series by Sophie Kinsella is my favourite. It is a bit rubbish, really, isn't it?' If Deborah wasn't a railway controller … 'At school, I wanted to be a fabric designer. I was very much into art.'

mercoledì 23 marzo 2011

Tav, liti al tempo del Risorgimento

DATE: 14/03/2011
AUTHOR: Ivone Cacciavillani

Ferrovie e l'unità d'Italia

Sta infuriando nel Veneto orientale la controversia sul tracciato ferroviario dell’Alta Velocità nel tratto tra Venezia e Trieste. Ci sono due versioni: una «alta», che la fa correre parallela alle attuali ferrovie e autostrada creando un unico corridoio; l’altra «bassa» che la fa passare rasente alle località balneari, attraversando una campagna ancora vergine, con scempio paesaggistico, secondo gli uni; meno grave - secondo altri- del disagio creato dal fascio di tre strutture giustapposte, che creerebbe una barriera insuperabile. Ovvio che a tale schematizzazione, forse un po’ superficiale, si aggiungono altri e più sofisticati argomenti a favore o contro l’una o l’altra tesi, ma per la nostra riflessione il quadro è sufficiente. Perchè è la diatriba sul tracciato che qui interessa non le ragioni dell’una o dell’altra scelta, ed interessa sotto il profilo celebrativo dei 150 anni dell’Unità. Ricordiamo un grande del Risorgimento veneto, tanto ingiustamente trascurato nel centralismo romanistico del politicamente corretto, che nell’olimpo dei «padri» annovera e onora alcuni, attribuendogli benemerenze non tutte meritate, ne ignora altri.

Daniele Manin è uno degli esponenti e lo fu da subito: repubblicano coerente e intransigente non si piegò ai Savoia e preferì l’esilio. Ovvio che nell’Italia sabauda non fosse politicamente corretto parlarne e l’ostracismo perdura nella labile memoria di noi veneti. La diatriba sulla Tav ce lo richiama alla memoria per un episodio «ferroviario» anteriore al ’48 e alla rinascita della Repubblica Veneta. È almeno un’occasione per parlarne. Il nostro - come si direbbe oggi - avvocato d’affari entra in scena nell’aspra controversia sul tracciato della Venezia-Milano programmata dal governo di Vienna fin dagli anni Trenta (dell’Ottocento) e affidata in «project financing» alla Società Anonima per la Imperiale Regia Strada Privilegiata Ferdinandea. Anche qui fu subito contesa fra tracciato «lungo», sostenuto dall’azionariato viennese che voleva far passare la linea da Bergamo per aumentare i profitti, e quello «breve», che da Brescia puntava dritto a Milano, sostenuto dagli italianisti per velocizzare le comunicazioni. L’avvocato Manin - l’episodio è tratto da una sua celebre biografia ottocentesca - «fece la sua prima comparsa in pubblico a Milano in una riunione di azionisti al Palazzo Brera, 12 agosto 1840. Era noto che la maggioranza dei presenti era favorevole al tracciato che toccava anche Bergamo, ma in cinque ore di discussione i patrioti, diretti dal Manin, dal conte Borromeo di Milano e da Valentino Pasini di Vicenza, riuscirono a ottenere che la decisione fosse rinviata. Quando poi Manin domandò la verifica dei poteri venne interrotto dal clamore irritato di una metà della sala e un agente di polizia, abituato a vedersi obbedire ad ogni più piccolo cenno, avanzò verso di lui e gli ordinò di tacere. Manin, rivoltosi fieramente contro quell’agente di straniero dominio, disse "è consiglio o comando? Se è consiglio io non l’accetto; se è comando perché è ingiusto io non mi piegherò che alla forza". Gli italiani presenti, anche quelli che erano di parere opposto nella discussione della ferrovia, balzarono in piedi e applaudirono. L’ufficiale di polizia se la svignò». Sull’onda del patriottismo prerisorgimentale prevalse la linea «breve», anche se per una ragione non propriamente «ferroviaria».

martedì 22 marzo 2011

La ferrovia di Garibaldi depredata e i binari della Bari-Taranto riciclati

DATE: 13/03/2011
AUTHOR: Diego Marzulli

CASSANO - L’antica rete ferroviaria Bari-Taranto, una delle prime grandi opere nel Sud, voluta da Giuseppe Garibaldi, è abbandonata nelle mani dei vandali. I binari vengono smantellati clandestinamente e trasformati in supporti per gli impianti di irrigazione di oliveti o in recinzioni o forse anche venduti come ferro vecchio. Il fenomeno riguarda alcuni tratti della linea ferroviaria ormai dismessa che ricadono nelle campagne di Grumo Appula, Sannicandro di Bari, Cassano delle Murge, Acquaviva delle Fonti e Adelfia. Questo tratto ferroviario è per diversi metri integro, poi improvvisamente risultano smantellate le rotaie per decine di metri con le traversine e la massicciata di brecciame lasciate al loro posto.

Considerando il peso di un metro lineare di rotaia tipo Vignoles antica (36 chili) ed il costo del ferro da rottamare al chilo di circa quindici centesimi, la deduzione è presto fatta. Da ogni cento metri di ferro trafugato si potrebbero ricavare fino a 550 euro. Insomma un valore considerevole che, lasciato incustodito, sta alimentando un insospettabile mercato nero. Mercato che naturalmente lucra sul valore grezzo del ferro, trascurando il valore storico e simbolico dell’intera opera.

La crescente domanda di trasporto pubblico ha coinvolto sin dall’antichità i governatori italiani ad una infinita necessità di reperimento fondi privati e pubblici per costruire, ammodernare ed ampliare le reti ferroviarie.

Il tratto ferroviario Bari-Taranto fu costruito nel 1865 dalla Società italiana per le strade ferrate meridionali, presieduta dal conte Pietro Bastogi che raccolse, grazie ai fondi di banchieri privati italiani, l’impegno di Garibaldi di costruire le linee ferroviarie per migliorare i collegamenti nel Meridione ex-borbonico. Con la statalizzazione delle ferrovie (1903-1915) nascono le Ferrovie dello Stato che si trasformano prima in azienda autonoma e infine a totale partecipazione statale attraverso il Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze.

L’ammodernamento della rete ferroviaria aveva interessato anche la linea complementare Bari-Taranto ricostruita una prima volta nei primi anni del ‘900 (sui binari dismessi si legge impresso il 1910 come anno di produzione), poi diventata più di recente a doppio binario e interamente elettrificata con corrente continua per garantire nei migliori dei modi il flusso di traffico dei treni regionali, Intercity ed Eurostar.

Decine di chilometri nel territorio della provincia di Bari (che corrono in alcuni tratti paralleli al nuovo doppio binario) sono così stati dismessi ma mai bonificati, diventando bottino per pochi e quindi saccheggiando le ingenti risorse economiche investite un secolo e mezzo fa. L’attuale società Ferrovie dello Stato Spa annovera, tra le diverse società controllate, la Rete Ferroviaria Italiana S.p.A. che cura la gestione e la manutenzione delle reti ferroviarie italiane e l’Italferr S.p.A. che cura la progettazione e la costruzione dei nuovi impianti.

Quanto alle linee dismesse le stesse Ferrovie dello Stato segnalano un’iniziativa molto qualificante che riguarda la medesima linea, ma nel versante tarantino ed esattamente a Palagianello dove il Comune ha bonificato la vecchia area ferroviaria dismessa realizzando una pista ciclabile. Sicuramente il recupero dei siti abbandonati che possono essere riqualificati resta la soluzione più rapida e per evitare incresciosi episodi.

venerdì 11 marzo 2011

On BART Trains, the Seats Are Taken (by Bacteria)

DATE: 05/03/2011
AUTHOR: Zusha Elinson

Carrie Nee prefers to stand during her half-hour commute on BART from San Leandro to downtown San Francisco. Although the trains’ blue fabric seats are plush and comfortable, Ms. Nee refuses to sit on them.
“I would love to sit down, but it just grosses me out. They’re disgusting,” said Ms. Nee, a 26-year-old records clerk.

Riders on the Bay Area Rapid Transit system have long complained about germs in the hard-to-clean cloth seats. As Bob Franklin, the BART board president, acknowledged, “People don’t know what’s in there.”

Now they do.

The Bay Citizen commissioned Darleen Franklin, a supervisor at San Francisco State University’s biology lab, to analyze the bacterial content of a random BART seat. The results may make you want to stand during your trip.

Fecal and skin-borne bacteria resistant to antibiotics were found in a seat on a train headed from Daly City to Dublin/Pleasanton. Further testing on the skin-borne bacteria showed characteristics of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, the drug-resistant bacterium that causes potentially lethal infections, although Ms. Franklin cautioned that the MRSA findings were preliminary.

High concentrations of at least nine bacteria strains and several types of mold were found on the seat. Even after Ms. Franklin cleaned the cushion with an alcohol wipe, potentially harmful bacteria were found growing in the fabric.

Dr. John Swartzberg, a clinical professor at the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley, played down the threat of infection from harmful bacteria on a BART seat. “I suspect it’s not a very big problem,” Dr. Swartzberg said. “That said, if there’s another way to do it, where you can clean it better, then you should do it.”

He said the cloth seats most likely allowed bacteria to flourish because they were more difficult to clean and disinfect.

James Allison, a BART spokesman, wrote in an e-mail that the findings were “not surprising,” considering that 330,000 commuters rode the trains daily. Last year, the BART police received 1,051 complaints of smoking, eating and drinking; 245 complaints of urinating or defecating; and 56 reports of spitting.

Mr. Allison encouraged riders to wash their hands and use hand sanitizers available at BART stations.

Hygiene has emerged as a key issue as BART officials determine what kind of seats to install for a new fleet of cars in 2017. In January, system employees were invited to test a variety of seat models at a Hayward warehouse. One employee, Melissa Jordan, filed a report on BART’s Web site about the trade-offs in selecting the new seats.

“Can I live with some type of seat that’s less cushiony — maybe padded vinyl instead of fabric — if it’s easier to keep clean?” Ms. Jordan wrote.

Ms. Franklin’s analysis also revealed that Muni, which uses acrylic plastic seats, appears to be more sanitary.

She tested a seat on the No. 28 bus, a route frequented by college students traveling from San Francisco State to Daly City. Two benign bacteria colonies were found. Unlike the BART seat analysis, Ms. Franklin’s test of the Muni seat after cleaning it with an alcohol wipe detected no bacteria.

Ms. Franklin tested the BART seat at the back of a Dublin/Pleasanton-bound train in the midafternoon. A swab taken from the seat cushion and headrest produced a veritable forest of mold and colorful bacteria.

In two separate tests, Ms. Franklin identified characteristics of the MRSA bacteria growing in the seat. The first test confirmed the presence of staphylococcus aureus, the skin-borne bacteria. A second confirmed that the bacteria, like MRSA, was resistant to the antibiotics methicillin and penicillin. But a third test intended to isolate the MRSA bacteria was negative.

MRSA is known as the “superbug” because it is resistant to antibiotics. It infects people through open wounds, attacking the immune system; 19,000 deaths each year are related to MRSA infections, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“There’s a probability that it is MRSA, but more tests would need to be done,” Ms. Franklin said. “Somebody probably was wearing shorts and had an infection, and there you go. It is concerning.”

Ms. Franklin identified two other bacteria strains that she said resulted from fecal contamination of the BART seat. Those strains were also resistant to antibiotics. The other bacteria did not appear to be harmful and are found throughout the environment, Ms. Franklin said.

The soft seat is a BART trademark, going back to Sept. 11, 1972, the day the first train rolled down the track. The seat covers are made of 90 percent wool and 10 percent nylon and are filled with foam padding, which was made fire-resistant after a fire in the Transbay Tube in 1979.

A BART brochure proclaimed that the new trains were designed to “lure the commuter out of the comfort of his automobile.” The trains were “almost as wide as a Boeing 707, and every bit as comfortable,” according to the brochure, which was printed in the shape of a BART car.

“BART was an all-new system, and they wanted everything to be different,” said Mike Healey, who was a BART spokesman at the time. “They wanted cushioned seats and rugs on the floors. Comfort was certainly a key selling point for the system.”

The marketing campaign worked. Ridership has grown. And the once-quiet suburban commuter train is now a heavily trafficked line.

“Things have changed,” said Mr. Franklin, the BART board president. “Now you’re no longer guaranteed a parking space. You’re no longer guaranteed a seat. There are 350,000 people traveling every day, as opposed to 50,000.”

BART cleaners go through trains every night and tackle the dirtiest seat cushions. Hard surfaces are wiped down with an industrial disinfectant.

Between 300 and 500 seat covers are removed each week and sent to a third-party vendor to be dry-cleaned and disinfected, Mr. Allison said. But that is a fraction of the 40,000 seats on BART’s 669 cars.

Dry-cleaning costs BART $595,000 a year. When necessary, BART replaces the cloth seats for an entire car — generally about 60 seats — at a cost of about $12,500. The system intends to continue rotating in new cloth seats as it continues to try out seats for the new cars.

Mr. Allison said that a major concern in designing the new cars was cleaner, more comfortable seating. BART plans to let the public test different types of seats in demonstration cars and then comment on their suitability.

Mr. Allison said that the choices for new seat models included hard plastic and padded vinyl.

Ms. Nee, the BART rider, said she would prefer hard plastic, especially after hearing the results of the bacteria analysis.

“I would seriously sacrifice my comfort for a more sanitary surrounding,” she said. “Granted, you’re going to be comfortable with the seats they have now, but I think your health is much more important than having your butt hurt for half an hour.”

mercoledì 9 marzo 2011

Michelangelo's David 'could collapse due to high-speed train building'

DATE: 04/03/2011
AUTHOR: Nick Squires

The statue is riddled with tiny cracks, particularly in the ankles of the boy warrior, and could collapse as a result of vibrations from the 1.4 billion euro project, which is due to start in the summer.

The threat of serious damage being done to one of the world’s most famous statues has prompted calls for it to be moved to a purpose-built museum away from the construction work.

“The tunnel will pass about 600 meters (2,000ft) from the statue of David, the ankles of which, it is well known, are riddled with micro-fissures. If it’s not moved before digging begins, there is a serious risk that it will collapse,” said Fernando De Simone, an expert in underground engineering.

The cracks in the marble are mostly in David’s left ankle and in the carved tree stump which bears part of the statue’s weight.

They are thought to have developed because for more than a century the statue leant at an angle, and because the marble used in the statue was not of a high standard.

Florence is divided over plans to construct a four-mile-long train tunnel and a six-level underground train station as part of a project to improve the Tuscan city’s rail links with Rome and Milan.

Mr De Simone said the 17ft high statue was already under intense strain because of vibrations caused by the 1.5 million tourists who troop through Florence’s Accademia Gallery each year to see the work, and due to traffic in the streets surrounding the building.

“The risk of collapse... will be very high if the resonance caused by excavation machinery for the high-speed train tunnel, as well as the vibrations of passing trains, are added to existing vibrations caused by visitors,” said Mr De Simone.

He has called on Florentine authorities to move the statue from its current location to a specially-built new museum, which should be designed to withstand tremors from earthquakes.

Vittorio Sgarbi, a prominent Italian art critic, called for the train tunnel project to be shelved entirely. “Our heritage should come before everything else. The excavation work should not go ahead,” he said.

Cristina Acidini, an official in charge of Florence’s museums, said the Accademia Gallery was being tested by engineers for its ability to withstand earthquakes and that an assessment of the tunnel’s potential effect on David would be conducted at the same time.

Florence is in a region of Italy which is prone to earthquakes and has a recorded history of more than 120 tremors, although none reached more than five on the Richter scale.

Michelangelo spent three years creating the statue of David, the biblical hero who killed Goliath with a single stone from his slingshot. It was unveiled in the city’s Piazza della Signoria in 1504.
After concern that it was being damaged by grime and rain, it was moved in 1873 to the Accademia Gallery, with a replica placed in the square, outside the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence’s centuries-old seat of government.

The marble figure was commissioned by Florence’s rulers to symbolise the city state’s ability, despite its small size, to fight off bigger neighbouring powers.